Frameworks that outlived the projects.

Reusable frameworks that outlived the projects they came from. Each one is a tool teams still use to make decisions.

MODEL A — HUMAN / AGENT SPLIT

Who does the work, by design

  • 60%fully autonomous
  • 25%agent prepares, human decides
  • 10%human-led
  • 5%human, augmented live

Applied in: HARP

MODEL B — INTERACTION TIERS

How AI shows up in the workflow

  • Autonomousruns in the background, logs on demand
  • Assistpull: the rep asks for help
  • Augmentpush: the system finds the rep

Applied in: HARP

MODEL C — PRINCIPLES AS TESTS

Guardrails anyone can check

  • Earn trust through transparency.Would they bet their commission on it?
  • One system, not twenty tools.How many tabs are open?
  • Measure selling time.Did customer hours go up?

Applied in: HARP

SERVICE-AI FRAMEWORK

Orchestration · Execution · Human override

Orchestration
Execution
Human override

Applied in: Quick Quote; DMI 2026 paper

The Service-AI framework is published: read the DMI ADMC 2026 paper (PDF) (opens in a new tab). See it applied in Quick Quote and HARP.

04 — CONTACT

Hiring a principal designer for complex, AI-heavy systems? Let’s talk.

© 2026 Parag DeshpandePrincipal Product Designer · UX Architect · Staff+ AI experience roles